-
Modeling the Economy, Energy, and the Environment with LIFT
-
Dr. Jeffrey F. Werling, Department of Economics; Executive Director of INFORUM, University of Maryland
Located in
Coming Up
-
More Young Adults Are Financially Dependent on Parents Than 50 Years Ago
-
Demography article by Kahn, Goldscheider, and Garcia-Manglano examines changing family residence patterns
Located in
Research
/
Selected Research
-
MPRC Special Workshop
-
Field Experiments in Population and Development
Located in
Coming Up
-
Nathaniel Hilger, Brown University
-
Labor / Public Finance / Development Economics seminar
Located in
Coming Up
-
New study by Haltiwanger, Davis, and Faberman featured on Fox Business
-
Quick hiring turnaround rewards proactive job seekers
Located in
News
-
Nolan Pope, Economics UMD
-
Timing is Everything: Evidence from College Major Decisions
Located in
Coming Up
-
Occupational Concentration, Wages, and Growing Wage Inequality
-
Elizabeth Handwerker, Bureau of Labor Statistics
Located in
Coming Up
-
Organizing for Power and Worker's Rights in the 21st Century
-
The University of Maryland's Center for the History of the New America to host symposium
Located in
News
-
Perverse Reverse Price Competition: Average Wholesale Prices and Medicaid Pharmaceutical Spending
-
Judith Hellerstein, University of Maryland; Mark Duggan, University of Pennsylvania; Abby Alpert, University of California Irvine; 2013-021
Located in
Research
/
Working Papers
/
WP Documents
-
Primer on Costs of Action/ Inaction and Communication to Policymakers
-
To support the African ChemObs project (the Integrated Health and Environment Observatories and Legal and Institutional Strengthening for the Sound Management of Chemicals in Africa), we provide a critical review of methodologies for valuing the health damages from policy inaction associated with chemical exposures. In particular, we discuss how disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and IQ loss should be valued. We conclude by providing advice on communicating the costs of inaction and the benefits and costs of action to policymakers. By the social costs of inaction, we mean the private or market costs, as well as the external costs, from pollution exposures compared with no exposure. Knowledge of these damages can then lead to policies designed to force investment and operating decisions in the market to account for (internalize) such costs/damages. The costs of inaction can be distinguished from the benefits and costs of action. The benefits of action are the value of, for example, the health improvements from regulations or other forms of action. These actions usually come with a cost of resources to bring about such actions. The net benefits to society of an action are the benefits minus the costs of action. In general, as regulations of chemicals rarely eliminate all exposures, the costs of inaction generally exceed (in absolute terms) the benefits of action.
Located in
MPRC People
/
Maureen Cropper, Ph.D.
/
Maureen Cropper Publications