|
Milkie’s work focuses on the relationships among social statuses, culture, and well-being. A basic question
underlying much of her research is how cultural meanings are a fundamental aspect of social differentiation and
inequality. It addresses how cultural meanings attached to social statuses and roles--for example, the “ideal?
female, the “good?father, or the stereotyped African-American--become manifest in people’s attitudes, behaviors,
and self-concepts, how these are contested and change; and how these cultural forces affect individual well-being.
This scholarship is critical because of its empirical analysis of culture as a stratification force and its
revealing of how the meanings, beliefs and practices that are connected to social locations of gender, ethnicity and
social class reverberate powerfully in people’s lives. Milkie’s approach extends symbolic interactionism, an
important social psychological perspective, by illuminating the differential power of females and ethnic minorities
to create cultural and social definitions and by examining disparities in the form of a greater gap between ideals
and realities for one group compared with another. For example, she shows how unrealistic beauty images act as a
powerful indirect force for white girls: even though they are critical of these, beliefs that others see the images
as normative, and use these as standards of evaluation, depress girls?well-being. Much of Milkie’s recent work has
examined gender ideals, roles and identities in families and how they are and are not being re-written in a changing
world. This research provides an important extension to family theories through illuminating the subtle ways in
which gender meaning systems are central to inequalities in family relations. In a book published with colleagues
this year, Changing Rhythms of American Family Life (2006), Milkie frames the cultural backdrop of mothering
and fathering behaviors during the era, illustrating the changing meanings of these gendered roles through empirical
analyses. Here too, the disjoint between cultural ideals and realities captures gendered inequalities in people’s
lived experiences. In other work, too, published in top sociology and family journals, Milkie and her colleagues
illuminate the consequences of the gendered meaning system, i.e., one in which different expectations and
experiences for men and women are contained within seemingly neutral roles like spouse, parent and worker.
Milkie is a co-investigator on a NIA-funded project, “Status Inequality, Stress and Health among Older People,?
in which Leonard Pearlin is the principal
investigator (P.I.). She has an R03 pending that focuses on explaining why problematic behaviors and emotions
exhibited by children are treated one way for whites and boys and different ways for children for whom the future
means less anticipated success. Seemingly “objective?behaviors take on different meanings based on the kind of
child exhibiting it. At the same levels of problematic behavior and emotions (as rated by parents and teachers),
the most advantaged group, white boys, are more likely to be channeled to medical professionals for their problems
in the ensuing two years, while others are less likely to be so directed. Interestingly, the school culture also
affects whether children will be channeled toward medical worlds. The higher the percentage of white children in
the school, the more likely a child’s behavior will be seen as a medical problem, above and beyond the individual
child’s social statuses. An R03 research proposal related to this work is under review at NIH.
Milkie has several papers in progress from her current research on children’s social statuses, cultural
inequalities, and well-being. In the future, she plans to further examine how inequalities shape children’s lives
and experiences by focusing on their own reports of school and peer experiences. Moreover, she plans to supplement
data from a nationally representative sample (the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten cohort), with
in-depth interviews of parents and teachers in order to complement her work on children’s social locations and
well-being.
|